Two senior European central bankers signaled on Thursday that the recent surge in energy prices could force them to tighten policy again, underscoring how the conflict-driven oil shock is complicating the fight against inflation. European Central Bank Governing Council member Yannis Stournaras said the ECB could be pushed to raise borrowing costs if oil prices stay elevated, while the Bank of England’s chief economist, Huw Pill, argued that strong inflation spillovers from the Iran-linked energy shock would warrant a rate increase, according to Bloomberg reports.
Stournaras, who has often been seen as one of the ECB’s more dovish policymakers, warned in comments reported by the Athens News Agency that a sustained high oil price would not be benign for the eurozone economy. His remarks suggest that even central bankers who have favored caution are increasingly focused on the risk that higher energy costs could keep consumer prices above target for longer than expected. The ECB has spent much of the past two years bringing inflation down from its post-pandemic peak, but a prolonged oil shock could slow or reverse that progress.
The warning comes as Europe watches energy markets closely after the disruption tied to the Iran conflict. Oil prices feed directly into fuel, transport and household energy costs, and they can also ripple through the wider economy by raising expenses for businesses that depend on shipping, manufacturing and raw materials. If those higher costs are passed on to consumers, inflation can remain sticky even if demand is slowing elsewhere.
Pill’s comments at the Bank of England carried a similar message. He said the central bank should be prepared to raise rates to counter “strong” price pressures spreading from the Iran energy shock, signaling support for more active policy if inflation begins to embed itself in the British economy. The BOE has already warned that the conflict could produce a range of outcomes for the UK, from limited inflation effects to a much more severe and prolonged price shock.
Taken together, the remarks show that major central banks are not treating the energy surge as a temporary market move, but as a potential threat to price stability that could require a policy response. That matters for households and businesses because higher rates would mean more expensive mortgages, loans and borrowing, even as energy bills remain elevated.
For now, policymakers remain data-dependent. Their next steps will likely hinge on how long oil prices stay high, whether the shock spreads through wages and other goods prices, and whether inflation expectations remain anchored. But the comments from Stournaras and Pill suggest that, if the energy shock deepens, rate cuts may stay off the table — and another round of tightening could return to the discussion.